[anglophobes, ne lisez pas la suite :-)] Hi !
Le Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez a écrit: > One day I tried again to boot those "problematic" kernels from the > same > PC, now upgraded to Woody, and the problems appeared in the same > places. > One thing that I noticed is that Alan's 2.4.x-acY kernels had no > problems booting where plain 2.4.x kernels failed. thanks a lot for the tip ! I compiled a kernel from the "plain" 2.4.13 sources with the ac-8 patch and it works fine. haaa... my radeon works and I can play tuxracer; great ! more seriously, thanks to all the people making the ac kernel-variants. Just one more -silly?- question: it seems -for me at least- that some of the ac patches should be integrated in the kernel, why aren't they ? (I repeat that ANY 2.4.17 variant I compiled won't even boot ! I'm not talking about kernel panic here) is my hardware so exotic ?? thanks again. PS: it worked also with a 2.4.13-ac5 :-) PPS: I don't mind to buils a few more kernel to identify which part(s) of the ac patches is(are) responsible of this non-non-booting ;-) situation but I need someone to guide me. PPPS: I'll have some time in a week; tomorrow I go skiing 8-) -- Stéphanie, Fabrice et Fiona -o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_V