Le mer 30/10/2002 � 17:18, zippo potamme a �crit :
> J'aimerai savoir si les deux sont complementaires ou au contraire font
> le meme boulot ?
> Merci d'avance 
> Zippo
dans le Linux ACPI-HOWTO

"You will need to rebuild your kernel to include ACPI support. Say 'y'
to the CONFIG_ACPI option. If you want to build in the (as yet)
experimental
support for sleep mode, say 'y' to the CONFIG_ACPI_S1_SLEEP option as
well.
You do not need to disable APM support; if ACPI support is found at
run-time, 
APM support will be turned off automatically in the running kernel.
If you want to try the new 2.4.0-test3 or later driver interface, say
'y' to
CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER, which builds the AML interpreter right into the
kernel and makes some changes in the /proc/sys/acpi interface as well."

et dans la page ACPI4LINUX (http://acpi.sourceforge.net/)

It is meant to supersede the older APM standard (for power management)
and provide a generic interface for recognition and configuration of
hardware devices.

En gros, acpi "remplace" apm pour les machines qui le supportent. En
pratique, c'est le premier qui est d�tect� au d�marrage qui se lance
emp�chant le second de faire quelquechose...

�mile
-- 
Leon est electricien,
il n'a pas son pareil pour denuder les femelles.

Répondre à