J'ai enlev� la limite de ping, pas de changement.
Comme Annie le conseiller dans sa r�ponse, j'ai ping� le premier routeur que je traverse et le ping est bon, pas de perte.

bart:/var/log# traceroute ns1.free.Fr
traceroute to dial-ns1-2.free.Fr (213.228.0.168), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  192.168.254.254 (192.168.254.254)  41.100 ms  39.061 ms  39.876 ms
2 vlq-6k-2.routers.proxad.net (212.27.37.61) 39.133 ms 37.825 ms 38.891 ms 3 vlq-6k-1-a6.routers.proxad.net (213.228.3.1) 40.840 ms 40.066 ms 39.560 ms
 4  dnscache1-l.proxad.net (213.228.0.168)  40.174 ms  40.112 ms  39.869 ms
bart:/var/log# ping -c 20 192.168.254.254
PING 192.168.254.254 (192.168.254.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=43.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=41.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=41.9 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=43.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=41.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=42.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=43.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=41.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=43.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=40.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=41.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=42.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=41.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=41.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=42.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=40.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=41.9 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=18 ttl=255 time=42.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=19 ttl=255 time=40.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.254.254: icmp_seq=20 ttl=255 time=41.7 ms

--- 192.168.254.254 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19016ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.399/41.933/43.459/0.952 ms

J'ai �galement v�rifier mes logs pppd, et j'ai une quantit� impressionnante de ces messages :

pppoe: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
PADS: System-Error: No resources

J'ai lu sur un forum que si la modem �tait connect� en ethernet, il �tait pr�f�rable que la carte r�seau soit en half-duplex. Est ce vrai ??

Merci

Thomas Labourdette wrote:
Le Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 12:33:12PM +0200, TRISTRAM Herve �crivait:

En entr�e, je limite les ping a 4/s apr�s la premiere seconde. J'ai essay� des ping d'une de mes machines du lan et comme tu peux le voir, c'est pas brillant.


bart:~# ping -c 20 cisco.com
PING cisco.com (198.133.219.25) 56(84) bytes of data.
20 packets transmitted, 14 received, 30% packet loss, time 62002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 187.573/242.683/315.356/39.817 ms


Et en enlevant la limite de 4 ping /seconde, �a donne quoi ?

@+

Répondre à