"Bruno Hertz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [quote "Larsi's Antwort"]
>
>  > Gmane apparently behaves differently, i.e. leaves MIDs intact, but
>  > this very much looks like an 'undocumented feature' which might change
>  > any day. Since it is still of relevance, I and I'm sure many others
>  > would highly appreciate some clarification on this matter.
>
>  Unconditional Message-ID rewriting is pretty silly, and I don't know
>  why anybody does that.  It break threading, might lead to injection
>  loops on Usenet, makes it difficult to respond in a sensible way.
>
>  So, no, Gmane is never going to start doing unconditional Message-ID
>  rewriting.  (It's sometimes necessary when the same message is posted
>  to several mailing lists, though.)
>
> [quote end "Larsi's Antwort"]


Noch ein Followup, FYI und um zu vermeiden, da� jetzt Leute an bofh.it
posten und vielleicht Larsi (falsch) zitieren.

Genauer macht es einen Unterschied, ob ein News server standalone ist,
wie Gmane, oder tats�chlich in's Usenet eingebunden ist, wie
bofh.it. Daher habe ich nochmal nachgefragt:


[quote "Meine Frage"]

> So, no, Gmane is never going to start doing unconditional Message-ID
> rewriting.  (It's sometimes necessary when the same message is posted
> to several mailing lists, though.)

That is, if I understand correctly, it's sometimes necessary to
specifically convert multiposts into crossposts ?

And that would then be the only reason you can imagine right now why
conditional MID rewriting might make sense for Mailing Lists/News
gateways ?

Thanks a lot, Bruno.

[quote end "Meine Frage"]


[quote "Larsi's Antwort"]

> That is, if I understand correctly, it's sometimes necessary to
> specifically convert multiposts into crossposts ?

It's not generally possible to convert multiposts, because you don't
know that it is a multipost until you see the second copy.  By that
time it's too late to do anything other than rewrite the Message-ID.

> And that would then be the only reason you can imagine right now why
> conditional MID rewriting might make sense for Mailing Lists/News
> gateways ?

Well, if the list is supposed to be distributed to the general Usenet,
then there's another reason.  it.lists.linux-kernel and
de.lists.linux-kernel might really be the same mailing list.  Then
news servers that carry both these Usenet news groups will look very
strange -- they won't have messages for these groups based on which
group got the messages in question first.

But if you're not a Usenet news server (and Gmane isn't a Usenet news
server), then that's basically the only reason.

[quote end "Larsi's Antwort"]


Also, in summa, w�hrend das MID rewriting bei bofh.it durchaus Sinn
machen kann, und daher in diesem Fall eben nicht am Gateway vorbei
gepostet werden sollte, ist ein rewriting bei Gmane eben nicht n�tig.

Gruss, Bruno.

Antwort per Email an