On Day 44 of Bureaucracy 3171, Thomas Letzner wrote: [...]
> Zum testen habe ich wpa_supplicant nicht daemon gestartet und zwar mit > diesem Befehl: > wpa_supplicant -w -i eth1 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dipw -d -t > > Das Ergebnis ist folgendes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/thomas # wpa_supplicant -w -i eth1 -c > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dipw -d -t [...] > Sep 20 23:22:21.304703: wpa_driver_ipw_set_wpa: enabled=1 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.304930: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=0 > set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.305095: Failed to set encryption. > Sep 20 23:22:21.305165: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=1 > set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.305326: Failed to set encryption. > Sep 20 23:22:21.305395: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=2 > set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.305555: Failed to set encryption. > Sep 20 23:22:21.305637: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=3 > set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.326082: Failed to set encryption. > Sep 20 23:22:21.326169: wpa_driver_ipw_set_countermeasures: enabled=0 > ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported > Sep 20 23:22:21.326325: wpa_driver_ipw_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1 [...] Welcher Kernel, welcher Treiber, wie gebaut, welches wpasupplicant? ttyl8er, t.k. -- We're Germans and we use Unix. That's a combination of two demographic groups known to have no sense of humour whatsoever. Hanno Mueller in dcoup -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject "unsubscribe". Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
