> He leido comentarios respecto a el nombre a utilizar. �Porque es mejor > utilizar la palabra 'unstable'?
Porque unstable es un enlace simbólico a sid, y siempre "apuntará" a la distribución inestable. Puedes comprobar esto con un simple "ftp ftp.uk.debian.org", mirando el directorio "dists". Por ejemplo: ftp> ls 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. 150 Here comes the directory listing. lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 5 Nov 20 2003 Debian3.0r2 -> woody -rw-rw-r-- 1 1000 1000 400 Nov 20 2003 README lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 23 Nov 15 2003 experimental -> ../project/experimental drwxrwsr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 Nov 20 2003 potato lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 22 Apr 03 2003 proposed-updates -> woody-proposed-updates drwxrwsr-x 5 1000 1000 4096 May 28 19:25 sarge drwxrwsr-x 5 1000 1000 4096 May 28 19:25 sarge-proposed-updates drwxrwsr-x 5 1000 1000 4096 May 28 19:25 sid drwxrwsr-x 2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 30 2000 slink lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 5 Apr 03 2003 stable -> woody lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 22 Apr 03 2003 stable-proposed-updates -> woody-proposed-updates lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 5 Apr 03 2003 testing -> sarge lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 22 Apr 03 2003 testing-proposed-updates -> sarge-proposed-updates lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 1000 3 Apr 03 2003 unstable -> sid drwxrwsr-x 5 1000 1000 4096 Feb 16 07:24 woody drwxrwsr-x 5 1000 1000 114688 May 28 19:24 woody-proposed-updates 226 Directory send OK. Haplo
