Thanks very much! It looks like quite a comprehensive answer (including
links) that I'll surely have to read more than once to absorb. (At that
point, I'll ask more questions if I feel the need.)
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:18:38 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:23:45PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a
> > lot?) OT,
> In that case it would be good to change the subject of the email.
> I've done so here.
> > but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new
> > inet6 addresses interact.
Other good stuff elided.