[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Alan Dorman) wrote on 29.03.96 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, I've not changed the hardware, and I'm excercising it more than I > was previously (keeping the load above 6, mostly), and yet I see no > SIG11s, even during the parallel compilations. That would tend to > cast significant doubt on the common assertion that SIG11 = hardware > problem, no? No. You have *one* case where the reason *may* be something different. On the other hand, there are at least thousands of cases where it *clearly* was a hardware problem - hardware fiddling made it go away. Apply the math yourself. MfG Kai
