In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.volatile) you wrote: > for debian sarge the volatile archive used to have different package > pins for volatile and volatile-sloppy:
> release o=volatile.debian.org,a=sarge,l=debian-volatile > release o=volatile.debian.org,a=sarge-sloppy,l=debian-volatile > For etch both archives use the same pin: > release o=volatile.debian.org,a=stable,l=debian-volatile > Unfortunately I don't see any possibility to give volatile and > volatile-sloppy different priorities in apt/preferences now (I know > the default priorities are set different, but that doesn't help if > you use your own priority scheme). > This forces me to assign both volatile and volatile-sloppy a low > priority (below 100 to avoid the auto update of packages from > volatile-sloppy) and to update the packages from volatile by > hand, which is not what I want. [...] Afaict, there are still different pins: http://debian.sil.at/debian-volatile/dists/etch/volatile-sloppy/main/binary-i386/Release Archive: etch-sloppy Component: main Origin: volatile.debian.org Label: debian-volatile NotAutomatic: yes Architecture: i386 http://debian.sil.at/debian-volatile/dists/etch/volatile/main/binary-i386/Release Archive: etch Component: main Origin: volatile.debian.org Label: debian-volatile Architecture: i386 Therefore release o=volatile.debian.org,a=etch,l=debian-volatile release o=volatile.debian.org,a=etch-sloppy,l=debian-volatile should work. It is hard to really test, since there are no Packages in etch-sloppy yet. It is possible that the "main" Release file http://debian.sil.at/debian-volatile/dists/etch/volatile-sloppy/Release overrides the one in the arch subdirectories. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
