On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:41:32PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 21:21:40 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > You wrote:
> > > first of all: am i missing something? > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dak ls libimdb-film-perl > > > libimdb-film-perl | 0.27-1 | unstable | source, all > > > volatile is thought for stable. But i can't find your package in stable. > > I intended the package to be released with etch, and provide updates via > > s-p-u, if necessary. However, the imdb site changed during the freeze > > and the release manager weren't too keen on allowing an updated version > > in etch at that time, so I opted to keep it out of testing/stable and > > move it to volatile instead. > release teams opinion/facts on this? Yes, I asked for this package not to be included in stable on the grounds that we could not guarantee support for it through a stable cycle due to outside factors (i.e., imdb.com changing their site). It looks ok for volatile to me. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
