On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 14:54, Teodor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jim Popovitch <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 13:59, Teodor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> IMO release candidate versions should not be uploaded to volatile. >> >> IMO "volatile" as used in "debian-volatile" is indicative of the >> project, not the package. ClamAV, a "moving target" type project, is >> an excellent example of a debian-volatile candidate. > > I'm not sure what you want to say, maybe I wasn't clear enough.
Sorry, yes I too agree that RC versions belong in experimental, not volatile. I only wanted to make sure (based on earlier comments) that volatile's purpose is clear. -Jim P. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
