I could rediscribe the method but I couldn't make changes as large as what
were suggested without going through the formal change process for the
constitution.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:27:43PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > I should point out that leaving this issue unresolved makes it possible for
> > people to raise a legitimate challenge to our voting procedure, since the
> > present description avails itself of multiple interpretations of the same
> > set of ballots.
>
> I agree with Branden. It would be good if Darren codified the exact
> current vote counting system and we made that the authoritative measure. I
> don't think this would need updating the constitution or the like..
>
> Jason
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
* http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< *
* Debian: Software in the Public Interest: *
* Project Secretary Treasurer *
* Webmaster Team *
* BTS Team siteROCK: *
* Lintian Team Linux Infrastructure Engineer *
PGP signature
