On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 06:31:50PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Obviously you have no problem with throwing out the social contract on a > whim. Please explain to where the proposed GR mandates this. I see an amendement of its language, but no blanket repeal of the document. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator? roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
- An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abo... Anthony Towns
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resoluti... Joseph Carter
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resoluti... John Goerzen
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Reso... Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General ... John Goerzen
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Reso... Chris Lawrence
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General ... Branden Robinson
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Reso... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General ... John Goerzen
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: Gene... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV:... Branden Robinson
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal ... Raul Miller
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Branden Robinson
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Raul Miller
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Branden Robinson
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Raul Miller
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Craig Sanders
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal ... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: An ammendment (Re: For... Buddha Buck
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV:... John Goerzen
- Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal ... Anthony Towns
PGP signature
