John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
- - snip - -
> the Constitution makes discrimination between voting methods based
> upon the Secretary's (or anyone else's) assesment of the relative
> importance of a document.
- - snip - -
Surely you meant "the Constitution makes no discrimination"
^^
or some other negative construction.
Otherwise, I fully agree with your statement.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Non-free Proposal Darren O. Benham
- Re: Non-free Proposal John Goerzen
- Re: Non-free Proposal Chris Lawrence
- Re: Non-free Proposal Buddha Buck
- Re: Non-free Proposal John Goerzen
- Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Goerzen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Robert D. Hilliard
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Goerzen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Santiago Vila
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Goerzen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Raul Miller
- Re: Non-free Proposal Robert D. Hilliard
- Re: Non-free Proposal Buddha Buck
- Re: Non-free Proposal Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: Non-free Proposal Josip Rodin
- Re: Non-free Proposal Anthony Towns

