On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> John Goerzen writes:
>
> > 4. During the Secretary's absence, the Constitution specifies that the
> > chairman of the Technical Committee should step up in his place.
> > However, that person is Ian Jackson and he failed with this duty. The
> > Technical Committee have failed to replace him with someone more
> > active in the Project.
>
> Did anyone actually call upon the Techincal Committee or its chair?
> It's possible that they dont' keep up with -private, and/or kill-filed
> the whole enormous flamewar...
So the Chairman of the Technical Committee needs to be nagged to perform
his duties? He can't be expected to subscribe to debian-vote and notice
that weeks pass after a CFV and the Project Secretary still hasn't issued a
ballot?
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | Mob rule isn't any prettier just because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you call your mob a government.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
PGP signature
