The mistake is acting to preclude some free distribution, support and use of software.
How do they preclude free distribution? By distributing non-free? Or by not distributing free instead of non-free?
I think you're talking about fairness, not ethics. You seem more concerned with the universality of our decisions than the result of those decisions.
I am concerned with the result of Debian decisions as well as with how they will be realized.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
