Sergey Spiridonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Remi Vanicat wrote:
Debian developers should have the choose to do what they want.
They already don't have the choice when someone asks them to help to fix the bug in the source of the program with the described non-free license. This is not because they are busy, but because they choose to agree with some non-free license before.
No, it was because the License was non free from the beginning, The fact that they agree or not with it doesn't change a darn thing to the fact that the can't do it.
We are both right, I was talking about the case #2, and you reminded me about the case #1. But this doesn't mean that Debian developers have a choice. Acting in the proposed way will eliminate case #2. Case #1 is up to the authors of non-free.
-- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
