* "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 14:45]: > I was promised that Debian would remain 100% free software. You want > to break that promise?
Who says so? Why would the keep of non-free somewhere (might it be
nonfree.org or our pools) be a break of that promise? non-free is no
part of Debian and never was. Keeping it somewhere doesn't change that.
> Or perhaps you could ratchet down the rhetoric, and stop accusing me
> of dishonesty and trying to control you and all the rest.
>
> Nor did Debian ever promise that whatever non-free packages you would
> want be supported by the infrastructure. Debian does not promise to
> any developer that their package will be carried, free or non-free.
Now /you/ are getting rhetoric, because this isn't the point.
So long,
Alfie
--
Aber der Aufwand Linux zu installieren und vim zu lernen ist *IMMER*
geringer, als Outlook das Schreiben von vern�nftigen Mails beizubringen. ;)
-- Jens Benecke [2001-06-02]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
