On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:55:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:59:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > On 2004-04-16 04:32:57 +0100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 09:19:39AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > >>Even if not "decided" unanimously, the "jury" doesn't seem to be in > > >>much doubt on it > > >where's the GR and the vote? hasn't happened. where's the policy > > >decision? > > The policy decision's at http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt: > > ] Code in main and contrib must meet the DFSG, both in .debs and > ] in the source (including the .orig.tar.gz) > ] > ] Documentation in main and contrib must be freely distributable, > ] and wherever possible should be under a DFSG-free license. This > ] will likely become a requirement post-sarge. > > That'll likely have to be amended somewhat to reflect the discussions about > firmware.
Huh ? Does this mean that we can move the ocaml-docs package to main again ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
