Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:15:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > I thought carefully about the last resolution, and assumed that it was > > blindingly obvious that of course changes would get phased in over a > > period of tim. > > I didn't see anything that made this obvious -- can you explain to me > the basis for this assumption?
It was obvious to me. I'm speaking about my subjective state, not about some inherent "obviousness". I assumed it was obvious, and it apparently wasn't. So I'm trying not to make the same mistake this time. > It might help if you could explain your reasoning. Note that Anthony has > stated that he's willing to reconsider his opinion (he's deferred that > decision to the Technical Committee), but so far no one has provided a > solid reason for that opinion to be overridden. I'm not asking for it to be; I'm happy to do it by GR. > Alternatively, you made a mistake and there was no reasonable way for > Anthony to anticipate that you made this mistake. In which case there > would be no way for him to talk to you ahead of time and tell you that > you were making this mistake. Nor did I complain that he didn't. But if I had said, "would this GR impose any delays on the release of sarge", I would expect him to say, "in my opinion, yes". Nobody asked, so it's not somebody's fault. I'm not expecting him to guess. But now I *am* asking. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
