Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frankly, I'm tired of the fucking accusations being levelled at me for > incompetence or insincerity or moral decrepitude or whatever whenever I > participate in these discussions, so you guys are going to have to work > out the answers for yourselves for once.
I do not accuse you of anything. But of the people you mentioned above (DPL, archive admins, release manager), you are the one who made it publically that the SC changes would also change the release policy for sarge. This is why we ask you. I can understand that you do not want to answer questions that, as you see it, are only asked in order to be able to blame you afterwards. On the other hand, if it turns out after the vote that you interpret the changes, as they have been accepted, in a different way than I (and hopefully many others) do it, or as the proposers intended - and I think those intentions are quite clear, *then* I would in fact blame you for not speaking up before we voted. If you are confident that this is not the case (and that the intentions are in fact clear), please say so, and I will not urge you further. If you don't, I must say that this make me doubt whether we will achieve what we want with the current wording, and with you as Release Manager. And I would rather change the wording, not the Release Manager. Regards, Frank -- Frank K�ster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
