On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 07:37:48PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > Wrong. I have given my own interpretation. I can restate it here if > you missed it: > > In my interpretation each of the five currently proposed GRs will > allow sarge to be released with the kind of non-free stuff in it > that the RM considered OK before 2004-003. > > With the obvious addition that, in case of proposal A this is only > true if sarge otherwise gets ready for release before September 1.
There's more to it than that (have you read proposal B yet, for example?), but I'll answer as a member of the tech committee (to which Anthony has delegated this decision): It's my current understanding that every single proposal is intended as a mechanism to get Sarge released. If one of these proposals passes with a sufficient supermajority, and the proposal in question leaves some question about whether or not Sarge should be released right away, I will argue and vote that the tech committee decide to release Sarge with the offending packages. That said, if proposals which make "release Sarge asap" unambiguous are voted against too strongly, I'd be inclined to change my mind if I don't have some reason to believe that "release Sarge asap" wasn't the reason for the lack of popularity of that option. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
