On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:23:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I beg to differ. Debian have ongoing discussion with the FSF on this issue, > > see <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/04/msg06892.html> for the > > status. To give a chance to this discussion, we agreed on postponing > > action (splitting of packages, position statement) until the discussion > > reach a conclusion. > > The original agreement was superceded by the social contract changes, > and affected more than just GFDL docs. The appropriate reference was > http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt. That reference hasn't > been changed to reflect the new social contract, and the new policy isn't > being acted upon yet, since this whole thing's still under discussion, > though.
I was not aware the agreement on postponing action was superseded. Could someone point me to the discussion on this topic ? Thanks! Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
