> > Does that mean non-free must be empty for Sarge? On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:40:25AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > You're impliing that, under your interpretation of the SC, non-free is part > of Debian. This interpretation would make the SC contradict itself, and > bring us to the silly situation in which a position statement that merely > reaffirms the SC is actualy violating it.
Being a part of the debian archives doesn't mean that something is a part of the debian [operating/application/...] system. Otherwise, for example, the part of our archives which hold list traffic would need release management. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
