-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> The technical committee is waiting to see the outcome of this GR, but > informally > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2004/06/msg00002.html If the RM has delegated the descision of the requirements for distributing sarge, could the TC take a stance on the proposals presented? Well looking at that post some of the points were: | ... It would be a bad idea to write a long document `under the gun'. ... This pretty much pleads agains proposal E. | ... Any such grandfather resolution should probably delegate reasonably | wide discretion about scope and interpretation to the Release Manager, | the Project Leader, the Committee or some other similar person or body, | to ensure that the resolution is sufficient and we don't need another | GR. ... Well none of the proposals really seem to do this, except for maybe proposals C and E. All the others fall back to the previous (ambiguous) SC. Would it be correct to assume that only the passing of proposal C will allow for a speedy release of sarge if it were up to the TC? - -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA2MOmVYan35+NCKcRArucAKCVSmfDlGmSbIUodR70NU2ajkkdUgCgyu9b XlmXyfD8bGJtE6X28lZNDzg= =dSqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
