On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:30:37AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:16:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:00:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I think call for votes, or for that matter, any message to > > debian-devel-announce should not have a m-f-t towards the announcement > > list. Replies on d-d-a are getting redirected to d-d anyway, and I think > > debian-vote is the appropriate place to discuss followups on messages > > like this one. > > > > You might also consider in addition setting a reply-to towards > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever is the ballot address of the > > current vote), to ease up on voting (how to vote? Hit reply, fill in you > > preferences after carefully researching them, and send). > > There WAS a reply-to. The M-F-T seems to complicate things though. > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/06/msg00006.html
That was indeed pointed out later, sorry for my mistake. I don't think the m-f-t complicates things, mail-followup-to is supposed to give directions where further discussions should take place, it's either a user, MUA or both mistake if m-f-t is followed for the actual vote/reply (not wanting to further discuss it). I don't know KMail well enough to know how intuitive/clear this distinction works there... --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
