On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:38:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Apparently you have woody/i386 (our stable arch) running on an amd64 box > today and are concerned about an upgrade path to amd64 in sarge.
Actually, it's sarge. > You're right, there isn't one. The answer is very simple- wait for > sarge+1 and multiarch. If you're happy with i386 on amd64 today then > feel free to continue to use it, I don't believe anything we're > introducing would cause you any problems there. That's not my concern. I can deal with the issues on my machine, just fine. But this is reminding me of some of the pain from the /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc/ transition. [Where most everyone thought it was easy right up until it became a big hairy mess.] I'd rather not go through something like that again. [And why did we go through that at all? For LSB compliance.] > I hope this clears up what your complaint with pure64 is so that other > people can read it and judge themselves how they feel about it. Not even close. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
