* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This isn't official or anything, but I think that /lib and /lib64 being > symlinks are perfectly adequate. As long as they're not symlinks to > the same place.
Yeah, sorry, not gonna be the way it works. They need to be the same
place for packages to work w/o modification and to be LSB compliant.
> > They would have to be modified to install packages into /lib64 for amd64
> > instead of into /lib like every other arch.
>
> This only matters for packages which provide libraries. You're talking
> a few dozens of packages which might need a fairly trivial patch.
Uh.. I could 921 binary packages currently *installed* on my system
that would need to be changed.. I've heard counts of at *least* a
couple hundred source packages from other people (in case my method of
counting was less than perfect for some reason-
dpkg -S lib/*.so* usr/lib/*.so*| cut -f1 -d: | sort -u | wc -l ).
The change isn't always all that trivial either. Though, regardless, it
would be duplicated work since it would have to be done for multiarch
again.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
