* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-20 16:53]: > > > This is something where I would really like to see our leader step in > > > and get the communication straightened out, rather than voting, but I > He's specifying a particular way of handling "this": one that the > DPL does not appear to be pursuing.
I am pursuing it. I posted the three items which are currently stopping the amd64 port to be added to the archive, and I'm in active contact with ftpmaster to move the new architecture and common architecture proposals forward; I've also asked someone to find out what the technical questions are and to get them posted. I've also asked a member of the amd64 porting team today to clarify what their thoughts are about an inclusion in sarge. It's quite interesting to note that there is no agreement at all among the amd64 porters whether the port should (in their opinion) be included in sarge or not. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
