Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The obfuscation continues! Let's not get caught up in the actual problems I'm > trying to put on the table. Let's stay focused on the fact that discussing > mistakes and the efforts to correct them makes you persona non grata.
When you were appointed President in July 2003, Branden had found an accountant to help with the work. From the minutes, it seems the SPI board did not revisit this topic before Branden's resignation is mentioned in January 2004. By May 2004, the apologies are being sent out. In general, status reports seem few and far between in the minutes. Aren't they meant to be part of the normal order of business under the SPI by-laws? As you were so happy to point out last summer, doesn't the president have some responsibility for checking SPI follows the by-laws? There do seem to have been problems with SPI. I don't think one member of the board can put the blame solely on one other member of it without clear evidence. At best, your abrasive hectoring conduct as SPI president did not seem to help. I don't think you should be so keen to raise this topic again. I don't think the SPI problems makes transparency and accountability any more or less of an issue in the DPL elections than it would have been otherwise. I would like to ask all candidates about them, but let's wait for campaigning to start. -- MJR/slef http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
