Whoops. I screwed up an edit. Let me redo it: Q: In June of 2004 it became apparent that SPI had deep set problems executing its chartered tasks. Donations equal to roughly half of Debian's total holdings did not make their way into the project's accounts due to poor (or non-existant) bookkeeping practices. It reflects poorly on Debian when donors are forced to correct for accounting errors in their own business caused by our mistakes. No typical business or professional organization can tolerate this type of failure in a mission critical area. As a DPL candidate, what actions will you take to insure that Debian's funds and other property are managed in a professional manner? How will you insure successful execution?
Sorry, I should have read it out loud. On Wednesday 02 March 2005 8:42 pm, MJ Ray wrote: > Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > Q: In June of 2004 it became apparent that SPI had been having deep set > > responsibilities executing its chartered task. [...] -- Ean Schuessler, CTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
