Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You haven't said anything sexist about it, except that it has a clear > purpose.
I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism. I've also described an incident of unchallenged racism on the debian-women list. While I believe the particular incident to have been dealt with, I don't think the setup has been changed to avoid future problems yet. > You sound like a good-old misogynistic curmudgeon. You sound like a habitual contradictor. Aren't we good together? > You have > certainly never given any indication that you are actually trying to > improve the position of women in Debian; all you have done is snipe at > those who have identified the problem and are trying to address it. [...] I have obvious problems doing that independently and I'm unwilling to join an group which discriminates against my heritage. I have suggested some improvements before, but I feel some are willing to paint any critics as like dangerous counter-revolutionaries, no matter what their view. Ulimately, I rank other barriers ahead of debian-women in urgency given my capabilties. I don't disagree much with your description of Jonathan Walther's actions, except that I see the task group report as a way of asking about the problems. He should have tried harder to ask the appointees, of course. -- MJR/slef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
