Sorry, I got trigger happy and mailed before reading Henning's response to your mail. In your references below, however, you still seem to be missing the point. The "small team" under discussion is not SCUD but rather the small teams that Andreas is suggesting the developers form in to.
From his response it seems that the teams will be voluntary and function related (ie. mp3 players) and will, therefore, pretty much be as they are now. I personally am involved with Debian-Java and hang out on #kaffe and some of us have attended various Free Java related functions together (redhat vm summit, fosdem, etc.) with much enjoyment by all. So, his clarification is important because it is a lot different from dividing the project into groups of seven random people and requiring them to meet regularly. On Tuesday 08 March 2005 9:44 am, David Schmitt wrote: > Please see > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/03/msg00298.html > > and > http://debian.edv-bus.at/vote-2005/project-scud.html > "Constitutionality" -- Ean Schuessler, CTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
