Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:03:20 18:35 -0800]: > > I post this now so that the information I have researched may be > > available to the voters, having waited until the end of the > > campaigning period to give each candidate a fully fair opportunity to > > answer for themselves. > > It was pretty of unfair to post this now. Having looked over the "data" you > posted, I see some things which lack extremely crucial information for > context, but pointing this out is almost like campaigning on behalf of the > candidates or taking potshots at the other. Either way they can't reply.
I would rather have had the candidates answer the question so I wouldn't have had to do the best I could. I gave them the longest time possible. Should I have pre-empted them? I thought it was more respectful to wait until they had had a fully fair chance to post their own answer, and my intention was to simply let their words speak for themselves (as I did for the one candidate who did reply). If I had posted sooner, I would have been criticized for having failed to give them an opportunity to answer for themselves. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
