On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:38:51 +0200, David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: 

> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:18:26 +0100, Matthew Garrett
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>> > If I sign three votes over the course of a day and then send them
>> > in reverse order, will the votes that were signed earlier be
>> > accepted even if they were sent later?
>> 
>> Sure. As far as devotee is concerned, the ordering when the ballots
>> were received is the only one that matters.  Since email ordering
>> is not guaranteed, you may wish to wait for devotee's ack is you
>> are firing off multiple ballots.

> So any signed vote made public can be used to override any later
> decision by the voter in question by replaying the publicised mail
> and signature.

        No, that would be stupid. This is why we have a guard against
 replay attacks.

        manoj
-- 
"Rage, rage, against the dying of the light!" Dylan Thomas
Manoj Srivastava   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to