On 10-Jun-99, 17:29 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For other ballots, I would be; for this one, I didn't find any > discussion necessary. I can't see why all discussion of a ballot > must occur on the debian-vote list. Most of these things being on > debian-devel, and could remain there.
Sigh. When we have non-technical discussion on debian-devel, people bitch and say "use another group" (thus the creation of debian-vote, -discuss, and innumerable other groups). When we then use those groups, people bitch because they miss the discussion. I sometimes think it's the same people arguing both ways (not implying that Hamish is doing this). Screw it. I say we go back to three non-moderated, non-announce groups: -user, -devel, and -private. And -private may NOT be used just because it's low-volume. Learn how to deal with the volume (procmail and threaded mail reader go a long way). Keep -announce, -devel-announce, and -security-announce: the audiences are sufficiently disting. Get rid of everything else. Steve
