Previously Richard Stallman wrote: > This way of holding the vote would tend to split the support for > change. I worry that 100 people might vote for 1, 100 people might vote > for 2, while 110 people might vote for 3--and 3 would win.
Our voting system allows voters to vote for multiple options (and in fact most people seem to use that feature). This allows one to say `I really prefer the first option, but if that isn't a reachable goal the second option is also good'. Does that solve your worries? Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgp3PgFWdgySx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
