Anthony Towns <[email protected]> writes: > I wish to propose an ammendment to the proposed resolution as follows.
This is not really an amendment. > 1) the Debian project continues to acknowledge the utility of providing > non-free software for it users. What do we need a GR for this? What makes you think that there is utility in us actually providing it? > 2) the Debian project also acknowledges that some developers may be > unwilling or unable to explicitly work on non-free software, and > holds that this is not and should not be detrimental to their work > on the Debian GNU/Linux distribution, or their contribution to the > Debian project. What do we need this in a GR for? > 3) the Debian project considers equating the importance of the "contrib" > and "non-free" areas described in the Social Contract with the > official Debian GNU/Linux distribution inappropriate. > What do we need this in a GR for? > 4) noting that the Debian project already distributes various other > collections of unofficial packages, the project endorses a move to > specifically collect the various other add-on components such as > "experimental", "orphaned", "non-free" and "contrib" and to clearly > separate these from the "main" collection. Vague. Are they not clearly separated already? If not, then you will require an amendment to the social contract in all likelihood.
