On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 07:36:09PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > Some views on the relationship of the constitution > and the social contract: > > Ian Jackson: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-9803/msg01778.html > Darren Benham: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0010/msg00019.html > Wichert Ackerman: ? > Branden Robinson: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0010/msg00036.html > > And, of course, we have the current situation, where "we" are trying to > change the social contract, and passion and procedure are tripping over > each other. > > Best resolution I can imagine is: we ratify the social contract > as having the same significance as the constitution. > > So, I'm proposing the following consitutional ammendment (to be > appended to the bottom of the current constitution): > > > C. The Social Contract > > Just as this constitution specifies how Debian decides what to > do, the Social Contract specifies what Debian is. As Debian > will occasionally need to redefine itself, the procedure for > modifying the Social Contract shall be the same as the procedure > for modifying this Constitution.
Should we also add the DFSG here ? Friendly, Sven LUTHER
