On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 04:08:45PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote: > I'm not sure it's a level of distrust, as much as a desire for a > sense of impartiality. Raul, in conducting this vote, would have > -three- hats to juggle: developer, Chair of the Technical Committee, > and Acting Secretary. As developer, he should be able to speak his > opinion and participate freely. As Chair of the Tech Comm, he should > speak only the decided opinion of the Tech Comm, and as Secretary, his > opinion shouldn't be a factor.
Hmm.., there's a good point there. Though it's actually four roles: I think potential acting secretary should be distinct from acting secretary [for when I'm not acting secretary, and I'm discussing the possibility that I need to step in as acting secretary.] I'll make a point of labelling my posts when being anything other than a normal developer. [This post, by the way, is from the perspective of all of my roles -- but most especially that of potential acting secretary.] Thanks, -- Raul
