On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:08:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > As to the social contract/dfsg issue; I think that arguably > > they can be deemed to be separate documents, perchance living in the > > same file by happenstance; in most correspindence since we have > > refeerred to them individually.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:17:28PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote: > I agree here. Let's take this opportunity to split them. List them both > as foundational documents if we intend to do so, but split them > regardless. I think the reason that they're stuck together is so that it's unambigous in the social contract what is meant where it says "Debian Free Software Guidelines". At this point, I guess it's likely that people have gotten the point. Thanks, -- Raul
