On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:07:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > "Status-quo" means don't resolve *anything*. There are at most two > ways of doing that: by doing nothing, and not even discussing the > matter again, and by doing nothing constructive, but continuing to > flame each other. I personally don't think that's a distinction > that'll be successfully determined by a vote, though.
I disagree. Status-quo in the context of supermajority means don't do anything that requires supermajority. That can still leave a lot of options. -- Raul
