On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:44:48PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > Proposal -- patch the constitution as follows: > ! A.6. Smith/Condorcet Vote Counting > > ! 2. A square "initial totals table" is constructed, recording the > ! ballot totals: the number in the table at row j, column k indicates > ! the number of ballots which prefer ballot option j to ballot > ! option k.
...etc.
So, uh, what happened to:
> Personally, I worry about any kind of wholesale change in the language
> of the constitution. Yeah, if you change major chunks of the document
> then current ambiguities would go away. But how do we know whether we're
> introducing new ones?
?
What you describe looks something like one of the Minmax variants or
the Tideman method described at:
http://www.fortunecity.com/meltingpot/harrow/124/methods.html
It doesn't use the Smith criterion directly. It's not particularly obvious
that it even satisfies the Smith criterion, afaict.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
pgpnofXVr0tvN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
