Previously Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > Well, since nothing serious has come from dpkg maitainers, it'd be > nice if a decent solution could be worked out.
Something serious *has* come from the dpkg maintainer. It is just that everyone seems to be horribly impatient and not interested in seeing a proper fix work on. My advise: get woody out the door. Once that is done we can proceed with normal dpkg development which we can't do know since we can't release the current codebase (insert rant about not having a proper seperate unstable here) and start working on major changes. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
