On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:28:37PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > To state my view directly, I strongly feel that in an election with > > no supermajority or quorum requirement, the default option should be > > treated as any other. > > > > Does anyone have a good argument against that?
I misread your question. Sorry. However, that in the Nov 18 draft, every election has a quorum requirement. [The winning option must receive at least one vote in every election.] In other words, from my point of view, you're asking an irrelevant question. Thanks, -- Raul
