Hello, I try to maintain a web page which explains our voting system. You can find this page at
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html
Among other things I want to explain the reasons for our changes to
the textbook version of Condorcet voting with clone-proof Schwartz
sequential dropping. Currently the page states
The Debian voting system differs from plain Condorcet voting in
several important points.
* ...
* It introduces the concept of a quorum. A quorum should assert
that there are no decisions without a sufficient number of
electors. ...
but in my opinion this description only fits for a more tradition
global quorum requirement (i.e. when the whole election is cancelled
if there are not enough electors). What reason should I give for the
introduction of our per-option quorum?
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
pgpE7Xf4265iN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
