On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:00:12AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote: > fre 2003-04-04 klockan 09.25 skrev Jochen Voss: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > > fre 2003-04-04 klockan 08.23 skrev Jochen Voss: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > on the "Debian Project Leader Elections 2003" page at > > > > > > > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0001 > > > > > > > > I read that "With 831 developers, Q=14.41353531, making a quorum of > > > > 43.2406059, or, rounding up, 44. Only one candidate failed to meet > > > > quorum." To find a cadidate which failed quorum I would look for a > > > > number less then 44 in the fifth column of the tally table. > > > > > > > > But there is no such number. So my question is: who did not meet > > > > quorum? How can I see this from the tally table? > > > > > > You have to look at (X,5) - (5,X), which gives you: > > How this? Do you have any references? I do not find such a > > rule, neither in current constitution nor in the current voting > > amendment draft. > > Sorry, I don't have any references, it just struck me as obvious based > on how condorcet voting works... But if it isn't obvious, it should > definitely be clarified.
Isn't it because the option 5 (none of the above, i think) is the default option ? Friendly, Sven Luther
