On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:44 AM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
for the ``quorum'' requirement: this is easy. require X number of seconds with each anti-second counting against the totally number of seconds.
So, in other words, drop Condorcet and switch to a simple majority vote instead. You've got votes for (seconds) and votes against (anti-seconds). How is this not a vote?
Requiring Q seconds would be much more reasonable, methinks.
this takes out all possibilities of strategic voting, and applies the strategy to the proposal stage. at least the vote tallying method remains untainted :/
Yeah, but it got ten times worse overall.
