>>>>> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> The only real way out of this, it seems, is to advocate insincere
Branden> voting. ("Please rank Mr. A's editorial-only amendments below
'further
Branden> discussion' even if you like them, because the whole purpose of
this
Branden> ballot is to decide whether we're accepting or rejecting
*substantive*
Branden> amendments to the Social Contract".)
Why do you believe the editorial-only amendments will be ranked above
the substantive ones?
