Anthony Towns <[email protected]> writes: > Why then would you want to remove that text? The only reason that I can > see is so that that support can be dropped by some process other than > the formation of a consensus by supermajority.
The you skiped over the part about ideology (which I belive the SC should describe) and pragmatism being different. It's a distinction I'm not surprised that not everybody see but it is important to me. -- Peter Makholm | I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | me, to everyone, and may each of you fry in hell http://hacking.dk | forever | -- The Dead Past
